Rules and Regulations Governing Essay Tests



 

By Hu Wo (Cuckoo’s Song)

 


Education and tests go hand in hand very of­ten. As always, tests play an essential role in formulating the education system of a nation. There are many types of tests in exam papers, such as placement tests, and the question items of these tests usually include at least one essay question. The essay tests represent a very flex­ible format that can potentially measure any skill that is acces­sible using other written test for­mats. This test is directly able to determine higher cognitive skills with the ability to communicate ideas in writing. The most nota­ble characteristic of essay tests is the freedom of response they provide, that is to say, creating, organizing, integrating, and ex­pressing the behaviours which call for the production and syn­thesis of ideas. The freedom of the response permitted by essay tests varies considerably from the range of giving a brief and precise response to determining the form and scope of the answer. Hence, essay tests are subdivid­ed into two types:

 

a) Restricted-response ques­tions

 

For example,

 

Describe the reading strate­gies of a book.

 

b) Extended-response ques­tions

 

For instance,

Write an essay on ``Books for All’.

 

In the restricted-response item of the essay question, the student is more limited and told specifically the context that his answer is to take. The boundaries of the subject matter to be con­sidered are commonly narrowly defined by the problem, also in­dicated by such words as `List’, `Define’, and `Give reasons’. Such questions can be prepared more easily, related more directly to specific learning outcomes at the comprehension, application or analysis levels and scored very quickly. However, they provide little opportunity for the student to show his ability to organize, integrate and develop essentially new patterns of response. These are of relatively little value for measuring outcomes at the syn­thesis and evaluation levels.

 

However, in the extend­ed-response item of the essay question, virtually no bounds are placed on the student as to the points for discussion and the type of organization in use. The student must be given sufficient freedom to demonstrate the skills of synthesis and evalua­tion. Those questions allow the student to express his ability to call upon and evaluate factual knowledge as well as organize and present his ideas in a logical, coherent fashion. On the other hand, their biggest problem is to evaluate the answers with suffi­cient reliability to give a useful meaning to learning.

 

Essay tests have both ad­vantages and limitations over question items written in other formats. Essay tests allow for di­rect measurement of more types of skills, examine the student’s ability to communicate ideas in writing and require the student to supply the response instead of selecting the responses provided by the item. In spite of this, essay tests offer a less adequate sam­pling of the content and limited course coverage, as usual. Their scoring is less reliable in that due to the subjective aspect of marking essay tests, scores as­signed to a given set of students’ responses are often inconsistent. Essay tests are also a consum­ing task to score. Even if fairly detailed scoring procedures are followed, and student’s respons­es are graded by more than one reader, the amount of time re­quired for scoring essay tests will increase further. Compared with objective tests, essay tests are inefficient for knowledge out­comes. The preparation of good items in essay tests is difficult. Not only their scoring but also their writing ability in one’s own ideas is no easy task, where bluff­ing is made possible rather than guessing.

 

Consequently, when con­structing essay questions, use questions to measure complex learning outcomes only; relate questions as directly as possible to the learning outcomes being measured; formulate questions that present a clear task to the student; do not permit students a choice among optional questions unless the learning outcomes require it; provide ample time for answering, suggesting a time limit in each question; use a rel­atively large number of ques­tions requiring short answers rather than just a few questions involving long answers; adapt the length of the response as well as the complexity of the question and answer to the maturity level of the student; use the novel type of question whenever feasible; write a model answer as well as prepare a scoring key to the question; and decide in advance what factors will be considered in evaluating an essay question.

 

In order to minimize the sub­jectivity of scoring essay tests, evaluate the answer to essay questions in terms of the learning outcomes being measured; score restricted-response answers by the point method using a model answer as a guide; grade extend­ed-response answers by the rat­ing method, using the defined criterion as a guide; evaluate all of the students’ answers to one question before proceeding to next question; evaluate an­swers to essay questions without knowing the identity of the writer; whenever possible have two or more persons to grade each oth­er; and finally, use the analytical method or the global method for scoring essay questions.

No comments

Powered by Blogger.